PROTOCol Lightteary PROGRamの価格LIT
USD
PROTOCol Lightteary PROGRam（LIT）の価格はUnited States Dollarでは-- USDになります。
この通貨の価格は更新されていないか、更新が止まっています。このページに掲載されている情報は、あくまでも参考情報です。上場した通貨はBitget現物市場で確認できます。
登録現在のPROTOCol Lightteary PROGRam価格（USD）
現在、PROTOCol Lightteary PROGRamの価格は-- USDで時価総額は--です。PROTOCol Lightteary PROGRamの価格は過去24時間で0.00%下落し、24時間の取引量は$0.00です。LIT/USD（PROTOCol Lightteary PROGRamからUSD）の交換レートはリアルタイムで更新されます。
1 PROTOCol Lightteary PROGRamはUnited States Dollar換算でいくらですか？
現在のPROTOCol Lightteary PROGRam（LIT）価格はUnited States Dollar換算で-- USDです。現在、1 LITを--、または0 LITを$10で購入できます。過去24時間のLITからUSDへの最高価格は-- USD、LITからUSDへの最低価格は-- USDでした。
PROTOCol Lightteary PROGRamの市場情報
価格の推移（24時間）
24時間
24時間の最低価格：--24時間の最高価格：--
過去最高値（ATH）:
--
価格変動率（24時間）:
--
価格変動率（7日間）:
--
価格変動率（1年）:
--
時価総額順位:
--
時価総額:
--
完全希薄化の時価総額:
--
24時間取引量:
--
循環供給量:
-- LIT
最大供給量:
--
PROTOCol Lightteary PROGRamのAI分析レポート
本日の暗号資産市場のハイライトレポートを見る
PROTOCol Lightteary PROGRamの価格予測
注目のキャンペーン
PROTOCol Lightteary PROGRam(LIT)の購入方法
無料でBitgetアカウントを作成します
Eメールアドレス/携帯電話番号でBitgetに登録し、アカウントを保護するために強力なパスワードを作成します。
アカウントを認証する
個人情報を入力し、有効な写真付き身分証明書をアップロードして本人確認（KYC認証）を行います。
LITをUSDに交換
Bitgetで取引する暗号資産を選択します。
よくあるご質問
PROTOCol Lightteary PROGRamの現在の価格はいくらですか？
PROTOCol Lightteary PROGRamのライブ価格は$0（LIT/USD）で、現在の時価総額は$0 USDです。PROTOCol Lightteary PROGRamの価値は、暗号資産市場の24時間365日休みない動きにより、頻繁に変動します。PROTOCol Lightteary PROGRamのリアルタイムでの現在価格とその履歴データは、Bitgetで閲覧可能です。
PROTOCol Lightteary PROGRamの24時間取引量は？
過去24時間で、PROTOCol Lightteary PROGRamの取引量は--です。
PROTOCol Lightteary PROGRamの過去最高値はいくらですか？
PROTOCol Lightteary PROGRam の過去最高値は--です。この過去最高値は、PROTOCol Lightteary PROGRamがローンチされて以来の最高値です。
BitgetでPROTOCol Lightteary PROGRamを購入できますか？
はい、PROTOCol Lightteary PROGRamは現在、Bitgetの取引所で利用できます。より詳細な手順については、お役立ちの購入方法 ガイドをご覧ください。
PROTOCol Lightteary PROGRamに投資して安定した収入を得ることはできますか？
もちろん、Bitgetは戦略的取引プラットフォームを提供し、インテリジェントな取引Botで取引を自動化し、利益を得ることができます。
PROTOCol Lightteary PROGRamを最も安く購入できるのはどこですか？
戦略的取引プラットフォームがBitget取引所でご利用いただけるようになりました。Bitgetは、トレーダーが確実に利益を得られるよう、業界トップクラスの取引手数料と流動性を提供しています。
今日の暗号資産価格
PROTOCol Lightteary PROGRam（LIT）はどこで買えますか？
動画セクション - 素早く認証を終えて、素早く取引へ
Bitgetで本人確認（KYC認証）を完了し、詐欺から身を守る方法
1. Bitgetアカウントにログインします。
2. Bitgetにまだアカウントをお持ちでない方は、アカウント作成方法のチュートリアルをご覧ください。
3. プロフィールアイコンにカーソルを合わせ、「未認証」をクリックし、「認証する」をクリックしてください。
4. 発行国または地域と身分証の種類を選択し、指示に従ってください。
5. 「モバイル認証」または「PC」をご希望に応じて選択してください。
6. 個人情報を入力し、身分証明書のコピーを提出し、自撮りで撮影してください。
7. 申請書を提出すれば、本人確認（KYC認証）は完了です。
PROTOCol Lightteary PROGRamを1 USDで購入
新規Bitgetユーザー向け6,200 USDT相当のウェルカムパック！
今すぐPROTOCol Lightteary PROGRamを購入
Bitgetを介してオンラインでPROTOCol Lightteary PROGRamを購入することを含む暗号資産投資は、市場リスクを伴います。Bitgetでは、簡単で便利な購入方法を提供しており、取引所で提供している各暗号資産について、ユーザーに十分な情報を提供するよう努力しています。ただし、PROTOCol Lightteary PROGRamの購入によって生じる結果については、当社は責任を負いかねます。このページおよび含まれる情報は、特定の暗号資産を推奨するものではありません。
Bitgetインサイト
BitbullNoah
20時
It looks like Lighter insiders may be influencing Polymarket odds ahead of the $LIT TGE and the on-chain behavior raises real questions.
Several large YES positions on the “Lighter airdrop before Dec 31” market were taken by newly created wallets, funded within days, each deploying six-figure size. Multiple wallets were funded from the same centralized exchange source, strongly suggesting a single controller splitting exposure.
At first glance, this could be written off as a whale using multiple wallets. But the pattern deepens.
One older wallet that entered the market much earlier was funded via a bridge from another wallet that also has historical links to a large depositor into Lighter itself. That depositor wallet moved significant funds into Lighter before any public announcements, before deposits were opened, and before invite-only access was known.
That timing matters.
Funds were positioned before the private beta, before mainnet deposit announcements, and before the broader market had access. That narrows the possibilities to internal use, early partners, or insiders with advance knowledge.
More recently, additional fresh wallets began funding large NO positions, again shortly after receiving funds from exchanges. Since then, odds have shifted noticeably. Either these are extremely confident gamblers or they know something about delays the public doesn’t.
This highlights a structural issue with prediction markets.
You’re not betting against vibes or sentiment.
You’re betting against participants who may have direct access to timelines, contracts, and internal decisions.
That asymmetry is dangerous.
Even if the outcome still favors a TGE before year-end, the presence of insider-aligned capital undermines market integrity. If this behavior becomes normalized, prediction markets risk doing long-term damage to crypto credibility far beyond what meme platforms ever did.
Bottom line:
Be careful where you place capital. In markets like this, information not probability is the real edge.
BitbullNoah
20時
It looks like Lighter insiders may be influencing Polymarket odds ahead of the $LIT TGE and the on-chain behavior raises real questions.
Several large YES positions on the “Lighter airdrop before Dec 31” market were taken by newly created wallets, funded within days, each deploying six-figure size. Multiple wallets were funded from the same centralized exchange source, strongly suggesting a single controller splitting exposure.
At first glance, this could be written off as a whale using multiple wallets. But the pattern deepens.
One older wallet that entered the market much earlier was funded via a bridge from another wallet that also has historical links to a large depositor into Lighter itself. That depositor wallet moved significant funds into Lighter before any public announcements, before deposits were opened, and before invite-only access was known.
That timing matters.
Funds were positioned before the private beta, before mainnet deposit announcements, and before the broader market had access. That narrows the possibilities to internal use, early partners, or insiders with advance knowledge.
More recently, additional fresh wallets began funding large NO positions, again shortly after receiving funds from exchanges. Since then, odds have shifted noticeably. Either these are extremely confident gamblers or they know something about delays the public doesn’t.
This highlights a structural issue with prediction markets.
You’re not betting against vibes or sentiment.
You’re betting against participants who may have direct access to timelines, contracts, and internal decisions.
That asymmetry is dangerous.
Even if the outcome still favors a TGE before year-end, the presence of insider-aligned capital undermines market integrity. If this behavior becomes normalized, prediction markets risk doing long-term damage to crypto credibility far beyond what meme platforms ever did.
Bottom line:
Be careful where you place capital. In markets like this, information not probability is the real edge.
BitbullNoah
20時
It looks like Lighter insiders may be influencing Polymarket odds ahead of the $LIT TGE and the on-chain behavior raises real questions.
Here’s the simplified version, without addresses:
Several large YES positions on the “Lighter airdrop before Dec 31” market were taken by newly created wallets, funded within days, each deploying six-figure size. Multiple wallets were funded from the same centralized exchange source, strongly suggesting a single controller splitting exposure.
At first glance, this could be written off as a whale using multiple wallets. But the pattern deepens.
One older wallet that entered the market much earlier was funded via a bridge from another wallet that also has historical links to a large depositor into Lighter itself. That depositor wallet moved significant funds into Lighter before any public announcements, before deposits were opened, and before invite-only access was known.
That timing matters.
Funds were positioned before the private beta, before mainnet deposit announcements, and before the broader market had access. That narrows the possibilities to internal use, early partners, or insiders with advance knowledge.
More recently, additional fresh wallets began funding large NO positions, again shortly after receiving funds from exchanges. Since then, odds have shifted noticeably. Either these are extremely confident gamblers or they know something about delays the public doesn’t.
This highlights a structural issue with prediction markets.
You’re not betting against vibes or sentiment.
You’re betting against participants who may have direct access to timelines, contracts, and internal decisions.
That asymmetry is dangerous.
Even if the outcome still favors a TGE before year-end, the presence of insider-aligned capital undermines market integrity. If this behavior becomes normalized, prediction markets risk doing long-term damage to crypto credibility far beyond what meme platforms ever did.
Bottom line:
Be careful where you place capital. In markets like this, information not probability is the real edge.
$POL $USDC
USDC+0.01%
POL-0.76%
Digitalsiyal
23時
On-chain narratives: UNI burned 100M tokens (~$596M) after the fee-switch proposal passed; XAUT followed gold to a new ATH near $4,550; CC jumped 22% on Canton’s new CIP-56 privacy-token standard; LIT’s founder said recent large transfers are unrelated to airdrops; LayerZero’s fee-activation vote failed
$UNI $BTC $BGB
BTC-0.18%
BGB0.00%
COINOTAG_NEWS
1日
LIT Token in Bearish, Sideways Market as Open Interest Drops 20% and Volume 30%; Buy Signal at ~$2B Fully Diluted Valuation Says Rollup Founder Andy
COINOTAG News reports on December 29 that The Rollup founder Andy noted, after an initial digest of token volatility, that LIT Open Interest (OI) is expected to drop by more than 20%, while trading volume could retreat by over 30%. The market is not in a bull market phase; instead, it shows a sideways, bearish bias, tempering near-term optimism for LIT investors.
Yet, even within this constrained milieu, a fully diluted valuation near $2 billion for LIT may present a calculated buy opportunity for traders with a longer horizon, provided price action and liquidity conditions align. The commentary emphasizes disciplined risk management and corroborates that the setup is more strategic than speculative.
Bitgetに新規上場された通貨の価格
