The U.S. Supreme Court examines the limits of the White House's stance in the "Trump v. Federal Reserve's Cook" case.

According to Odaily, during the hearing of "Trump v. Federal Reserve's Cook" at the U.S. Supreme Court today, Chief Justice Roberts asked: If Cook made an "unintentional mistake" in the mortgage documents, where is the boundary of the White House's position? Whether it is an unintentional mistake or a fraudulent act to obtain a better interest rate, does it make no difference to the White House? On what grounds can it be determined that the Federal Reserve is an executive agency, and thus the President indeed has the power of removal? (Golden Ten Data)