a benchmark index has three stocks priced at example

Market-value-weighted benchmark index — three-stock example

a benchmark index has three stocks priced at $23, $43 and $56. This article uses that canonical classroom dataset to show how a market-value-weighted (market-cap weighted) benchmark index is constructed, normalized to a base value, and recomputed after price changes to preserve continuity. Readers will get step-by-step numerical calculations (market values, divisor determination and new index level), plus practical guidance on adjustments, limitations and applications for funds and products such as ETFs or index-tracking strategies. The worked example is suitable for beginners while remaining faithful to standard index methodology (reference: STOXX methodology principles).

Definition and purpose of benchmark indices

A benchmark index is a numeric representation of the performance of a predefined basket of securities. Benchmarks serve multiple roles: they measure portfolio performance against a market standard, provide underlying reference values for index-tracking products, and act as market health indicators for commentators, investors and institutions.

Common purposes of benchmark indices include:

• Performance measurement for active managers and strategies.
• Underpinning passive products such as ETFs and index funds.
• Serving as settlement or reference levels for derivatives or structured products.
• Offering a transparent, replicable way to report market or sector performance.

For teaching and operational clarity, many textbooks and problem sets (for example the Chegg exercise and the UNM Investments problem set) use small canonical datasets. In one such classroom exercise, a benchmark index has three stocks priced at $23, $43 and $56 with specified outstanding shares — a compact problem that illustrates weighting and divisor mechanics directly.

Types of index weighting methodologies

Index providers use multiple weighting schemes. The most common are:

• Price-weighted: weight depends on the stock price alone (e.g., classic Dow-style calculations).
• Market-value-weighted (market-cap weighted): weight is price × shares outstanding; widely used for broad-market indices.
• Equal-weighted: each constituent receives the same weight regardless of size.
• Fundamental-weighted: weights based on accounting measures (sales, dividends, book value) or other fundamentals.

Each methodology treats constituent prices and shares differently and produces different risk exposures and return dynamics for the same set of constituents.

Price-weighted indices

A price-weighted index gives each constituent influence proportional to its share price. The index level is typically the arithmetic average of constituent prices adjusted by a divisor that accounts for splits or other non-market-driven events. Key characteristics:

• High-priced securities dominate index moves even if their market capitalization is small.
• Simple to calculate, but less representative of economic magnitude than market-cap weighting.
• Requires divisor adjustments for corporate actions to avoid artificial jumps.

Market-value (market-cap) weighted indices

A market-cap weighted index assigns each constituent a weight equal to that security's market value (price × shares outstanding) divided by the sum of market values across all constituents. Advantages include:

• Reflects the economic size of issuers.
• Easy to interpret: moving market caps drive index moves.
• Common for broad-market benchmarks and many investable indices.

Because market cap is proportional to the aggregate value investors allocate to a company, market-value weighting is intuitive for products that aim to replicate total market exposure.

Mechanics of a market-value-weighted index

At its core a market-value-weighted index converts total market value into an index level using a normalization factor or divisor. The general formula is:

Index level = (Sum of constituent market values) / Divisor

The divisor is chosen so that the index equals a prescribed base value at the start date (for example 100 or 970), enabling historical comparability. When corporate actions occur (splits, large share issuance, mergers) or when the index is reconstituted, index providers typically adjust the divisor so that the index level remains continuous and is not affected by non-market-driven changes.

Market value calculation for each constituent

For each constituent:

Market value (market capitalization) = Price per share × Shares outstanding

Constituent weight = Constituent market value / Sum of constituents' market values

Weights derived this way ensure that larger companies (by market value) influence the index proportionally more.

Index base value and divisor

A base index value is selected to set a convenient starting level (e.g., 100, 1,000, or — in some classroom problems — 970). The initial divisor is solved from the chosen base:

Divisor = (Total market value at base date) / Base index value

The divisor is a bookkeeping constant that carries forward until an adjustment is required. When corporate actions or certain rebalancings would otherwise change the index level without reflecting real market value movement, the divisor is adjusted such that the index value before and after the event is unchanged.

Worked example — three stocks (exercise)

This section walks through the standard classroom exercise. For concreteness, a benchmark index has three stocks priced at $23, $43 and $56 with outstanding shares 350,000; 405,000; and 553,000 respectively. The index is normalized to a base value of 970 on the base date. Later the prices change to $23, $41 and $58 — we show how the index level updates using the same divisor.

Note: the canonical dataset mirrors exercises found in classroom problem sets and investment-methodology sources (Chegg-style and UNM Investments problem descriptions). The numerical steps below demonstrate market-cap calculations, divisor derivation and the recalculated index level.

Step 1 — compute initial market values and total market value

Compute market values (price × shares):

• Stock A: $23 × 350,000 = $8,050,000
• Stock B: $43 × 405,000 = $17,415,000
• Stock C: $56 × 553,000 = $30,968,000

Total market value (base date) = $8,050,000 + $17,415,000 + $30,968,000 = $56,433,000

These market values form the numerator in the index formula. The constituent weights on the base date would be:

• Weight A = 8,050,000 / 56,433,000 ≈ 14.27%
• Weight B = 17,415,000 / 56,433,000 ≈ 30.86%
• Weight C = 30,968,000 / 56,433,000 ≈ 54.87%

The weights show that in a market-cap weighted index, Stock C is the largest driver of index moves because of its larger market capitalization.

Step 2 — determine the initial divisor from the given base index value

The divisor is chosen so that (Total market value) / Divisor = Base index value. Here the base index is 970, so:

Divisor = Total market value / Base index = 56,433,000 / 970 ≈ 58,188.65979381443

This divisor is carried forward to later dates until an adjustment is required. Its purpose is normalization: it converts a dollar-denominated total market value into a convenient index scale (970 in this classroom example).

Step 3 — compute new market values and new index level

Suppose the three prices move to $23, $41 and $58 respectively. Recompute market values:

• Stock A (new): $23 × 350,000 = $8,050,000 (unchanged)
• Stock B (new): $41 × 405,000 = $16,605,000
• Stock C (new): $58 × 553,000 = $32,074,000

New total market value = $8,050,000 + $16,605,000 + $32,074,000 = $56,729,000

Apply the unchanged divisor to obtain the new index level:

New index level = New total market value / Divisor = 56,729,000 / 58,188.65979381443 ≈ 974.92

Interpretation: the index has moved from 970 (base) to roughly 974.92 after the price changes. The small rise reflects the net change in total market value driven primarily by Stock C’s rise from $56 to $58, partially offset by Stock B’s fall from $43 to $41.

This worked numerical example illustrates the basic mechanics of a market-value-weighted index: compute market caps, choose a divisor to normalize the base level, and recompute the index using the unchanged divisor unless an adjustment is warranted.

Adjustments and maintenance

Real-world indices undergo routine maintenance to ensure representativeness and continuity. Key maintenance topics include corporate action adjustments, periodic reconstitution or reweighting, and the application of capping rules or free-float adjustments.

Handling corporate actions (splits, mergers, dividends)

Corporate actions can change share counts or per-share prices without reflecting real changes in company value. Index providers adjust the divisor or constituent market values to prevent index distortion:

• Stock splits: a divisor adjustment is usually made so that the index level is unchanged immediately after the split (price falls, shares double, market value unaffected).
• Mergers and acquisitions: index rules determine whether the merged company remains, is replaced, or is removed; divisor adjustments preserve continuity.
• Large share issuances or buybacks: when outstanding shares change materially between reconstitution dates, index methodology may require an adjustment.

The guiding principle: the index level should only move because of observable price-driven changes in market value, not solely due to bookkeeping events.

Rebalancing and reconstitution

Indices are periodically reconstituted (changing the list of constituents) or rebalanced (adjusting weights). Common reasons include:

• Calendar-driven reconstitution (quarterly, semiannual): update constituents to reflect market developments and liquidity.
• Sector or market-cap drift: constituents may grow or shrink beyond index rules and require replacement.
• Free-float adjustments: apply changes to shares available to public investors.

When constituents change, index providers adjust the divisor (or equivalent normalization) so the index value is continuous across the rebalancing event. Products that track the index must also rebalance to maintain tracking, which may cause transaction costs and temporary tracking error.

Practical considerations, advantages and limitations

Market-value-weighted indices are widely used for their simplicity and alignment with investor capital distribution, but they carry both advantages and limitations.

Advantages:

• Reflect economic size: larger companies (by market value) receive proportionally larger representation.
• Low maintenance for weighting: weights change automatically with market moves.
• Intuitive for passive investors seeking market-cap exposure.

Limitations:

• Concentration risk: rapidly rising constituents can dominate index performance, increasing single-stock risk.
• Overweighting of overvalued names: if a company becomes overvalued, market-cap weighting increases exposure to it.
• Liquidity and investability: very large constituents may be less liquid in some markets, complicating full replication.

For index-tracking funds (ETFs, mutual funds), these limitations translate into tracking and implementation choices. Passive fund managers may apply capping rules, free-float adjustments, or partial replication to mitigate concentration while preserving broad-market exposure.

Variations and related index methodologies

Index providers commonly apply variations to pure market-cap weighting to address practical concerns:

• Free-float adjusted market-cap weighting: uses only the shares available to the public (excludes locked-up strategic stakes), giving a more investable weight.
• Capped weighting: imposes maximum weights on individual constituents (e.g., 10% cap) to reduce concentration.
• Equal-weight transforms: rebalance periodically to equal weights, offering different return and risk characteristics.
• Fundamental weighting: weights based on financial metrics (dividends, sales, book value) rather than market price.

These variations are described in standard index methodology guides (for example, STOXX and other providers publish detailed rules explaining divisor treatment, capping rules, free-float definitions, and reconstitution procedures).

Example applications and use cases

Market-cap weighted indices are used widely across investment and reporting contexts:

• Benchmarking active managers: measure alpha relative to a market-cap benchmark.
• Underpinning passive products: ETFs and index funds that replicate the index composition.
• Performance reporting: index values used in corporate and fund performance disclosures.
• Risk analysis and factor studies: index constituents and weights feed portfolio risk models and stress tests.
• Derivatives settlement: futures and options may use index levels as settlement references.

For traders and portfolio managers, the clear link between market caps and index weights helps with hedging and constructing overlay strategies. For product providers and exchanges, robust methodology documents ensure transparency and trust for end investors.

Market context and a timely note

As of 2026-01-17, according to Bloomberg, technology names have driven unusual sector performance in European indices, with heavy concentration in several chip-equipment companies that together explain a large share of the sector’s rally. That real-world example illustrates how a few large constituents — by market value — can dominate index returns and volatility. Index constructions that use market-cap weighting will naturally reflect such concentration; methodology choices (free-float adjustments, capping) can mitigate concentrated exposure while preserving representative market coverage.

Source note: As of 2026-01-17, Bloomberg reported that technology is the best-performing Stoxx Europe 600 sector in January and that several chip equipment firms account for a substantial portion of the rally. This underscores the practical implications of market-cap concentration for index users.

See also

• Market capitalization
• Price-weighted index
• Index divisor
• Index fund
• ETF
• Index reconstitution

References and further reading

• Chegg-style classroom exercise: canonical three-stock market-cap problem (primary illustrative dataset used throughout this article).
• UNM Investments problem set (index averaging concepts and divisor explanation).
• STOXX Index Methodology Guide (methodology patterns for market-cap weighting, divisor adjustments and free-float rules).
• Bloomberg (2026-01-17): reporting on sector concentration and index performance dynamics in European technology sectors (used for timely context).

Notes on sources: the worked example numerical dataset mirrors common classroom problems used to teach index mechanics. STOXX methodology documents and standard index provider guides remain authoritative references for divisor treatment, free-float definitions and index maintenance rules.

Further exploration: to experiment with index calculations and replicating small indices in practice, users can run the three-stock exercise in a spreadsheet, altering prices and shares to observe index sensitivity. For those interested in trade execution, custody or wallet integrations related to tradable index products, consider exploring Bitget’s platform features and Bitget Wallet for secure custody and order execution support.

Actionable next steps

• Try the three-stock calculation yourself in a spreadsheet: recompute market caps, choose a base index, solve the divisor and test different price paths.
• If you are building or tracking index-based products, document corporate-action rules and divisor adjustment policy to preserve continuity.
• Learn how Bitget’s trading platform and Bitget Wallet can support trade execution and secure custody for index-based strategies and tokenized products.

Explore more educational content and methodology primers to deepen your understanding of index construction and maintenance.