are stocks good for retirement: a guide

This guide explains why stocks are commonly used in retirement portfolios, the historical evidence, main risks (volatility, sequence-of-returns), allocation rules of thumb, implementation options, ...

2025-12-24 16:00:00

By ChainSync Analyst

Article rating

4.5

118 ratings

Bitget offers a variety of ways to buy or sell popular cryptocurrencies. Buy now!

A welcome pack worth 6200 USDT for new users! Sign up now!

Are stocks good for retirement?

Asking "are stocks good for retirement" is one of the most common and important questions for people planning to stop working or reduce paid work. Stocks (equities) are widely included in retirement portfolios because they offer long‑term growth that helps combat inflation and the risk of outliving savings, but they also introduce volatility and sequence‑of‑returns risk that must be managed. This article walks through the role of stocks in retirement, the evidence and risks, allocation guidance, implementation tactics, withdrawal strategies, tax/account issues, behavioral considerations, common objections and practical next steps. Throughout, the aim is to be beginner‑friendly, data‑oriented, and neutral — not investment advice.

Note: As of January 2026, according to Fortune, high‑profile moves by experienced long‑term investors and executives (for example, a senior hire from a long‑standing investment team) highlight continued professional emphasis on stock selection and portfolio stewardship. As of January 2026, MarketWatch reporting and related industry commentary underline ongoing questions about rollover choices, required minimum distributions, and how retirees manage workplace plans and IRAs.

Role of stocks in a retirement portfolio

Stocks are included in retirement portfolios primarily for growth. Over multi‑decade retirement horizons, growth assets help preserve and increase purchasing power after inflation, medical cost rises, and higher living costs. Bonds and cash provide income and stability; stocks provide appreciation potential.

Key functions of stocks in retirement portfolios:

Long‑term growth: Stocks have historically delivered higher average returns than bonds or cash, which helps portfolios support decades of withdrawals.
Inflation protection: Because corporate earnings and dividends can rise with prices over time, equities can help preserve real (inflation‑adjusted) purchasing power.
Total return component: Even if a retiree prefers income, equities contribute to total return (price appreciation plus dividends) that can be partially harvested via withdrawals or converted to income-producing holdings.

That said, growth comes with volatility. A retiree who holds stocks must be prepared for value declines and plan withdrawals and liquidity so declines do not force distressed selling.

Historical evidence and expected long‑term returns

Historically, broad stock market indexes have outperformed bonds and cash over long horizons. Studies and practical advisor benchmarks commonly referenced include multi‑decade returns for large‑cap equities, total market indices, and comparisons between stock‑bond mixes.

Highlights from long‑term evidence (illustrative, not predictive):

Over many 20–30 year periods in the U.S., broad equities have produced average annual nominal returns in the high single digits to low double digits, while long‑term government bonds have tended to return lower single digits—though results vary by time window and country.
Equities show higher variability: annual returns can swing widely, with frequent years of negative returns and occasional deep drawdowns.
Past performance is not a guarantee of future returns; long‑run averages are influenced by valuation levels, economic growth, demographics, and policy.

Advisors commonly use practical benchmarks: for example, a 60/40 stock/bond blend has been evaluated across historical sequences to study withdrawal sustainability. Large custodians, academic papers, and industry reports (see Further reading) provide the empirical studies and simulations advisors use to set expectations.

Main risks of holding stocks in retirement

Market volatility

Stocks fluctuate in value, often sharply. Volatility matters more for retirees because withdrawals may occur during down markets. A short‑term drop in portfolio value can reduce assets available for future growth and increase the chance of depleting the portfolio if withdrawals continue at the same rate.

Sequence‑of‑returns risk

Sequence‑of‑returns risk describes the problem that the order of investment returns matters when a retiree is withdrawing from a portfolio. Negative returns early in retirement combined with steady withdrawals can disproportionately shorten portfolio longevity, even if long‑term average returns end up being reasonable.

Example effect:

Two retirees with identical average returns can experience very different outcomes if one suffers large losses in the first five years and continues withdrawing, while the other enjoys positive early returns. Early losses reduce the capital base and reduce the benefit of later recovery.

Longevity and inflation risk

If a portfolio is too conservative (too many bonds/cash), a retiree faces higher probability of outliving savings because returns do not keep pace with inflation and spending needs — especially important with rising healthcare costs and longer life expectancy. Equities help address longevity risk by offering growth potential.

How much stock should retirees hold?

There is no single correct answer; allocation depends on individual circumstances. Common rules of thumb and observed practices include:

Age‑based rules: simple formulas such as "100 (or 110 or 120) minus your age" give a percentage for stocks. For example, 110 − 65 = 45% in stocks.
Fixed allocations: many retirees use target mixes such as 40–60% stocks and the rest in bonds/cash, adjusted for risk tolerance.
Target‑date funds and glide paths: these funds gradually reduce stock exposure as the participant ages; their implementation varies but the principle is gradual de‑risking.
Empirical variation: surveys and institutional guidance show variation — some retirees maintain higher equity exposure (50%+), especially those with larger portfolios, while others choose more conservative mixes.

These rules are starting points to be personalized.

Factors that should modify stock allocation

Adjust allocation based on:

Time horizon: Longer expected retirement length supports higher stock exposure.
Risk tolerance: Emotional and financial tolerance for swings — can you sleep at night if the portfolio drops 30%?
Guaranteed income: Pensions, annuities, and Social Security reduce the need for stocks because they cover essential spending.
Portfolio size and spending rate: Smaller portfolios or higher withdrawal rates typically need more conservative allocations or alternative income strategies.
Health and longevity expectations: Anticipated lifespan and family history may push allocation up or down.
Spending flexibility: Ability to cut discretionary spending in bad markets supports higher equity exposure.
Behavioral response: If volatility causes rash decisions (e.g., selling during downturns), reduce equity exposure or use buffers.

Portfolio construction and implementation

Diversification and asset allocation

Diversification reduces idiosyncratic risk. Key diversification dimensions:

Geography: domestic and international equities.
Market cap and style: large cap, mid/small cap, value/growth mix.
Sectors: spread across industry sectors to avoid concentration risk.

Broad, low‑cost diversified funds capture market returns while limiting single‑company risk.

Use of index funds and ETFs vs active stock picking

For most retirees, low‑cost index funds and ETFs are recommended because they provide broad exposure, low fees, and predictable tracking of market segments. Active stock picking and frequent trading typically incur higher fees and have historically underperformed passive approaches for many investors. Retirees especially benefit from predictable, low‑cost access to diversified equity exposure.

When using ETFs or funds in retirement, prioritize funds with low expense ratios, appropriate tax characteristics for the account type, and sufficient liquidity.

Rebalancing and glide paths

Rebalancing: Periodically restore allocations (e.g., annually) to target ranges to maintain risk posture. Rebalancing forces selling of overweight assets and buying of underweight ones, which can improve long‑term returns and control risk.
Glide paths: Gradually reduce stock exposure as a retiree ages or as the portfolio shrinks. This can be implemented via target‑date funds, a custom schedule, or adaptive rules that respond to market valuations and personal circumstances.

Withdrawal and income strategies

Fixed rules and the 4% rule

The 4% rule is a widely known guideline: in its classic form it suggests a retiree can withdraw 4% of the initial portfolio value in the first year and then adjust that dollar amount for inflation annually, with a reasonable probability of not running out of money over a 30‑year horizon. Important caveats:

Assumptions: The rule is based on historical U.S. returns and a 50/50 to 60/40 stock/bond mix in many studies.
Limitations: It is not guaranteed, sensitive to sequence‑of‑returns, inflation shocks, high withdrawal needs, and different market regimes.

Dynamic withdrawal strategies

Dynamic strategies adjust withdrawals based on portfolio performance or use guardrails:

Percentage‑of‑portfolio rule: Withdraw a fixed percentage each year (e.g., 3–5%), which automatically reduces withdrawals after poor returns.
Guardrail/band strategies: If the portfolio drifts outside set ranges, withdrawals are adjusted up or down.
Retirement withdrawal algorithms: Some rules blend guaranteed income with flexible withdrawals.

Dynamic approaches can reduce ruin risk but require discipline and may imply variable income year‑to‑year.

Income generation from portfolios

Ways to generate income from retirement portfolios while keeping equity exposure:

Dividends: Dividend‑paying stocks or dividend ETFs can supply cash, though dividend yields vary and are not guaranteed.
Income ETFs and covered‑call strategies: Some ETFs target higher income via options overlays or higher‑yield equities; these can increase current income but may cap upside and have different risk profiles.
Bond/cash buckets: Maintain short‑term buckets to cover near‑term spending needs and avoid forced selling of equities during downturns.
Annuities: Convert a portion of the portfolio into guaranteed income (see Risk‑mitigation techniques). Annuities have tradeoffs (fees, liquidity) and should be evaluated carefully.

Combining growth (stocks) with income sources (bonds, annuities, dividends) is a common approach.

Risk‑mitigation techniques for retirees holding stocks

Practical tactics to reduce the negative effects of stock market volatility:

Bucket strategy: Maintain several buckets (short‑term cash for 1–5 years of spending; intermediate bonds for medium needs; long‑term stocks for growth). This reduces the chance of selling equities in a downturn.
Bond ladders: Build a ladder of maturing bonds or CDs to provide a predictable stream of cash for near‑term withdrawals.
Cash cushion: Keep a cash cushion equal to 6–24 months of expenses, or more depending on risk tolerance and market conditions.
Guaranteed income products: Partial use of immediate or deferred annuities can cover essential spending and reduce reliance on market returns. Evaluate fees, inflation riders, and company credit.
Tactical rebalancing rules: Use rules to rebalance into underpriced assets during market stress while preserving liquidity buffers.

Tax and account considerations

Account type influences where to hold stocks and bonds because of tax efficiency:

Tax‑deferred accounts (traditional 401(k)/IRA): Withdrawals are taxable. Holding higher‑growth assets here may push taxable income in distribution years; Roth conversions can be used strategically.
Roth accounts: Qualified withdrawals are tax‑free. High‑growth assets can be tax‑efficiently sheltered in Roths, particularly if you expect higher future tax rates.
Taxable accounts: Use tax‑efficient funds (index funds), harvest losses, and prefer tax‑efficient asset placement. Interest from bonds is often taxed less efficiently than qualified dividends/long‑term capital gains.

Withdrawal sequencing matters: deciding which account to tap first (taxable, tax‑deferred, Roth) affects after‑tax cash and long‑term tax exposure. Work with a tax professional for personalized sequencing.

Behavioral and planning considerations

Assess how you will react to drawdowns and test plans under stress:

Emotional tolerance: If market moves cause panic selling, a lower equity allocation or guarantees may be appropriate.
Stress testing: Run historical drawdown tests or Monte Carlo simulations to see how allocations and withdrawal strategies would have fared under many scenarios.
Regular review: Revisit allocation, spending plans, and taxable strategies annually or when circumstances change (health, inheritance, job changes).

Criticisms, common objections, and counterarguments

Common objection: "I have a short horizon in retirement, so stocks are too risky."

Counterargument: Horizon is important, but even retirees typically face multi‑decade horizons due to longevity. Partial equity exposure helps protect purchasing power over long retirements. Practical compromises include using buckets, guaranteed income, and a smaller equity share.

Common objection: "Volatility will force me to sell at the bottom."

Counterargument: Proper liquidity planning (cash cushions, bond ladders, annuities) and dynamic withdrawal rules reduce the need to sell in down markets.

Common objection: "I’d rather be conservative and avoid market risk."

Counterargument: Overly conservative portfolios can suffer from low returns and inflation erosion. A balanced approach addresses both risks.

The right compromise balances growth needs with the retiree’s psychological comfort and income guarantees.

Practical checklist for retirees

Calculate guaranteed income: add Social Security, pensions, and annuities to estimate covered basic needs.
Budget and forecast spending: detail essential vs discretionary expenses and update annually.
Determine time horizon and mortality expectations for both partners if applicable.
Assess risk tolerance and likely behavioral responses to drawdowns.
Choose an asset allocation: use rules of thumb (e.g., 110 − age) as a starting point and adjust for individual factors.
Build liquidity for near‑term needs: 1–5 years of expenses in cash/bonds depending on risk tolerance.
Implement with low‑cost diversified funds (index funds/ETFs) and appropriate account placement (taxable vs tax‑deferred vs Roth).
Set withdrawal rules (fixed, dynamic, or hybrid) and rehearse bad‑market scenarios.
Use risk‑mitigation tools: bond ladders, bucket strategy, or partial guaranteed income where appropriate.
Review annually and consult a fiduciary planner when uncertain.

Call to action: explore Bitget Wallet for secure custody of digital assets and Bitget resources for education on portfolio products and low‑cost trading tools.

Reporting context and selected timely notes

As of January 2026, according to Fortune, high‑profile hiring moves within the institutional investment community (for example, senior hires from long‑standing investment teams) emphasize ongoing institutional focus on disciplined stock investing and portfolio stewardship.
As of January 2026, MarketWatch reporting and consumer Q&A pieces note that leaving a 401(k) with a former employer may be sensible for some people (for reasons including plan cost, creditor protection in some states, and the age‑55 withdrawal exception), while others prefer rolling to an IRA for broader investment options and potentially lower fees.

These timely reports underline practical retirement decisions that interact with stock allocation choices: account location matters, plan rules (RMDs, age exceptions) matter, and professional stewardship of equity allocations continues to be a focus of institutions.

Neutral summary and next steps

To return to the central question — "are stocks good for retirement" — the balanced answer is: yes, stocks are generally an important part of many retirement portfolios because they supply needed long‑term growth and inflation protection, but they are not a one‑size‑fits‑all solution. The appropriate equity share depends on horizon, guaranteed income, portfolio size, health, risk tolerance, and the retiree’s ability to tolerate volatility. Use diversification, low‑cost implementation (index funds/ETFs), liquidity buffers, and tested withdrawal rules to manage risks.

Further actions you can take today:

Revisit your retirement budget and guaranteed income sources.
Run a simple simulation or historical drawdown check on your current allocation.
Establish a liquidity buffer equal to several months or years of spending depending on your comfort with market swings.
Consider where high‑growth assets (stocks) should sit among taxable, traditional, and Roth accounts for tax efficiency.
If needed, consult a fiduciary financial planner for a personalized plan.

Explore Bitget resources and Bitget Wallet for secure management of crypto and digital assets if these are part of your broader portfolio, and consult tax and legal professionals about account decisions.

The content above has been sourced from the internet and generated using AI. For high-quality content, please visit Bitget Academy.