do oil stocks rise during war? Explained

This article examines whether do oil stocks rise during war, summarizing mechanisms, historical case studies, academic findings, sector differences, and practical indicators. Read on to learn when ...

2026-01-16 03:28:00

By Ravi Clark

Article rating

4.4

112 ratings

Bitget offers a variety of ways to buy or sell popular cryptocurrencies. Buy now!

A welcome pack worth 6200 USDT for new users! Sign up now!

Do oil stocks rise during war?

This article asks a straightforward question: do oil stocks rise during war? In the first 100 words we address that question clearly. do oil stocks rise during war is a common search by investors and analysts wondering whether military conflicts or major geopolitical crises tend to lift the equity prices of oil and energy companies. Short answer: do oil stocks rise during war? Often they can in the near term when conflicts threaten physical supply or raise risk premia, but outcomes vary by conflict scale, location, market expectations, and company fundamentals.

What you will get from this guide: clear mechanisms linking conflicts to oil prices and equities, historical case studies (1973, 1990–91, 2003, Russia–Ukraine era, recent Middle East tensions), academic evidence on predictability, sector-by-sector differences, practical indicators to watch, and investor considerations — all without market advice.

Key mechanisms linking war, oil prices, and oil stocks

do oil stocks rise during war depends first on how a conflict affects supply, demand, and market sentiment.

Supply disruptions: Wars or military actions near producing regions can reduce exports, damage infrastructure, or trigger sanctions. Reduced crude flows tighten physical supply and lift spot prices.
Demand shifts: Military operations increase fuel consumption for fleets and aircraft in the short run; conversely, broader economic uncertainty can depress demand if growth slows.
Sanctions and trade shifts: Sanctions on a producer or shipping restrictions can remove barrels from global markets, creating a political risk premium.
Pass-through to equities: Higher oil prices generally raise revenues for producers and some service firms, improving margins if costs do not rise equally — this can push oil stocks higher.
Risk and insurance premia: Increased shipping insurance costs, rerouting of tankers, and higher freight costs can amplify price moves and affect midstream/refining economics.

Futures markets, inventories, and the term structure (backwardation or contango) moderate price responses. For example, when the futures curve is in backwardation (near-term prices exceed longer-dated prices), immediate supply concerns are priced higher, which tends to translate into larger spot-price and equity reactions. When contango prevails, forward markets and inventories can cushion short-term shocks. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) and market commentary regularly note that inventories and spare capacity are key buffers to geopolitical shocks.

As of June 1, 2024, per EIA commentary, global commercial inventories and spare OPEC+ capacity were central in determining how much oil-price spikes would feed through to markets and energy equities.

Historical evidence and notable case studies

The relationship between conflicts and oil equities is episodic. Below are selected historical case studies illustrating different outcomes.

1973 oil embargo and 1970s crises

The 1973 Arab oil embargo and subsequent 1970s supply shocks caused dramatic oil-price spikes. Oil prices quadrupled in nominal terms across the mid-1970s. do oil stocks rise during war in this episode? Many energy-company equities saw large gains as revenue and cash flow expectations jumped, but the broader economic damage from high oil prices (stagflation) produced complex long-term effects on markets and investment flows. The 1970s experience showed that while energy equities could benefit, macroeconomic fallout created broader equity market headwinds.

1990–91 Gulf War

In 1990–91 the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait and the Gulf War produced an immediate spike in oil prices as Kuwaiti exports and some Iraqi output were disrupted. Short-term reactions included sharp moves in commodity prices and differentiated equity responses: oil producers and some integrated majors rallied on higher price expectations, while broader market risk-off pressured other sectors. After the crisis, prices and stocks settled as supply resumed and OPEC restored flows.

2003 Iraq invasion

The 2003 Iraq invasion created brief price volatility and heightened risk premia. Oil prices rose on disruption fears, and many energy equities advanced in the short run. Over the medium term, however, prices and stocks were influenced by global demand growth and changes in spare capacity, underscoring that conflict-induced moves can be temporary.

Russia–Ukraine (2022 onward) and sanctions era

do oil stocks rise during war? The Russia–Ukraine conflict from 2022 onward provides a modern example where sanctions and trade shifts affected European energy markets and global commodity prices. As of March 2022, many benchmark crude prices moved sharply upward due to sanctions risk and lost Russian exports to certain markets. In some cases, energy equities — especially producers with flexible sales options — benefited from higher prices. However, companies and regions directly exposed to sanctions or facing counterparty and logistics challenges experienced divergent stock performance. As of June 1, 2024, reporting from major financial outlets documented that energy-sector returns were heterogeneous: some upstream names posted strong revenue and free-cash-flow beats, while others faced customer and contract disruption.

Recent Middle East tensions (reporting through mid-2024)

In several episodes of heightened Middle East tensions in 2023–2024, markets reacted with short-lived oil-price jumps and volatile equity moves. As of May 15, 2024, per Investopedia and other mainstream outlets, brief supply-risk scares pushed Brent and WTI higher and led to rallies in many energy stocks, although the moves often reversed once markets judged escalation contained or spare capacity adequate. These episodes highlight that do oil stocks rise during war is not a universal rule — timing, market positioning, and perceived duration of supply risk matter.

Empirical research and academic findings

Academic studies find that oil-price changes and geopolitical risk can sometimes predict stock returns, but the predictability is concentrated in a relatively small number of extreme events. Research summarized in peer-reviewed outlets indicates:

Predictability is event-driven: Oil-price shocks tied to clear supply disruptions or embargoes have stronger predictive power for energy equity returns than routine price volatility.
Limited long-term abnormal returns: A naive trading strategy that simply buys oil stocks when crude jumps often yields insignificant abnormal returns once event timing, transaction costs, and risk premia are accounted for.

A ScienceDirect literature overview and other academic papers emphasize that geopolitical shocks are statistically important around crisis windows, but outside those windows the relationship is weaker and noisy.

Short-term vs. long-term performance

Short-term:

do oil stocks rise during war? Frequently, yes: when a conflict threatens supply, oil and E&P shares can react quickly as analysts adjust near-term cash-flow expectations.
Volatility: Short-term gains are often accompanied by elevated volatility and wide intra-day swings.

Long-term:

Fundamentals win: Over months and years, company fundamentals — production capability, reserve quality, cost structure, hedging, balance sheet strength — determine returns.
Macro dampening: If a conflict slows global growth, the demand side can compress prices later, undermining initial gains for energy equities.

Market behavior often follows a pattern where an initial risk-off across equities can be followed by sector rotation into defense and energy. This sequencing explains why energy stocks sometimes outperform in the near term but do not guarantee sustained outperformance.

Differences across the energy sector

The energy sector is heterogeneous. do oil stocks rise during war varies by sub-sector.

Integrated oil majors

Integrated majors (upstream + refining + marketing) often show resilience because refining and downstream operations partially hedge higher crude costs through product margin changes. Their diversified cash flows and larger balance sheets can mute extreme equity swings compared with pure producers.

Exploration & production (E&P) companies

E&P firms have higher leverage to spot crude prices. When prices jump and are expected to persist, E&P revenues and free cash flow can surge, leading to pronounced stock gains. Conversely, they face higher operational disruption risk if infrastructure is affected.

Oilfield services and equipment providers

Service firms depend on exploration and capex cycles. If a conflict prompts higher long-term investment in production or alternative supply development, service providers could benefit. But if uncertainty reduces capital spending, these companies may underperform despite higher spot prices.

Refiners, midstream, and downstream firms

Reactions are mixed. Refiners can gain if product cracks (margins) widen, but they may be hurt by feedstock price rises if processing margins compress. Midstream companies with fee-based contracts show more stable earnings and may be less sensitive to spot volatility, while those with commodity exposure can move with oil prices.

Market structure, policy, and moderating factors

Multiple structural and policy factors moderate how conflicts affect oil prices and equities:

OPEC+ responses: Production increases or coordinated cuts can offset supply disruptions or exacerbate them.
Strategic petroleum reserve (SPR) releases: SPR injections by consuming countries can blunt near-term price spikes.
Global spare capacity: The amount of spare production capacity in the market is a crucial shock absorber.
Shipping-lane risks: Disruptions to chokepoints (e.g., Strait of Hormuz) raise insurance and freight costs, amplifying spot-price moves.
Central bank policy and macro outlook: Rate policy and growth expectations influence investor risk appetite and equity valuations.

As of June 1, 2024, EIA and market commentators highlighted spare OPEC+ production and SPR releases as decisive in whether price spikes translated into sustained equity gains.

Investor strategies and considerations

Common approaches investors use to express views on conflict-driven oil moves include:

Sector selection: Buying integrated majors for more stable dividend and cash-flow exposure or picking E&P firms for higher beta to spot prices.
Diversified ETFs: Energy-sector ETFs can provide broad exposure and reduce single-company risk.
Futures and options: Commodity futures or options offer direct exposure but require active management and carry roll/contango risks.
Hedging: Use of options or diversified portfolios to limit downside in volatile episodes.

Risk-management points:

Volatility and liquidity risks are elevated during crises.
Timing is difficult: markets often price in events well before visible escalation, and “sell-the-news” reactions are common when outcomes are clearer.
Company balance sheets matter: firms with strong liquidity and low leverage are better positioned to weather supply disruptions and capitalize on higher prices.

If you trade or hold energy exposure, consider execution and custody choices that suit your needs. For crypto-native or derivative exposure, Bitget offers trading infrastructure and custody tools; for spot or ETF exposure, use regulated brokerage services and ensure you understand counterparty and settlement terms.

Practical indicators and data sources

Key metrics to monitor when assessing whether do oil stocks rise during war and by how much:

Brent and WTI prices: immediate indicators of crude-market stress.
Futures curve shape (backwardation vs contango): backwardation signals tight near-term supply and often stronger equity reactions.
Commercial inventories: headline inventories from the EIA and IEA show available buffers.
Spare production capacity: OPEC+ spare capacity is a key shock absorber.
Sanctions and trade-flow announcements: removal of barrels from commerce matters more than rhetoric.
Refinery margins (crack spreads): measure refining economics that affect integrated firms.
Company exposure: production geography, offtake contracts, and hedging programs.

Primary sources to consult:

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) publications and Today in Energy analyses.
Major financial news outlets (Investopedia, Bloomberg, CNN, AP, BBC, Morningstar) for event reporting and market reactions.
Academic literature (ScienceDirect reviews) for historical and econometric studies.

As of June 1, 2024, EIA weekly petroleum status reports and Today in Energy pieces provided up-to-date inventory and production metrics crucial for interpreting price moves.

Limitations and caveats

Context matters: not all conflicts cause higher oil prices or rising energy stocks. Scale, location, and the expected duration of supply disruption are critical.
Pricing-in: Markets often price risk early; a lack of further escalation can produce sharp reversals.
Academic evidence: Predictability of energy equities around geopolitical events is concentrated in a few extreme episodes — outside those, relationships are noisy.
No investment advice: This article summarizes patterns and indicators; it does not recommend buying or selling securities. Always consider your personal circumstances and consult licensed professionals.

References

Below are the principal sources used to compile this guide. Each reference is cited in neutral, factual form to support empirical claims and reporting summaries.

As of June 1, 2024, U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) reports and Today in Energy analyses on petroleum inventories, futures curves, and supply responses informed the discussion of inventories and term-structure effects (EIA weekly petroleum status and Today in Energy commentary).
Investopedia reporting and educational pieces on the impact of wars and geopolitical tensions on markets and sectors (coverage of energy stocks rising as oil jumps and broader market effects). As of May 15, 2024, Investopedia summarized recent episodes where oil prices and energy stocks reacted to Middle East tensions.
Major news outlets (CNN, AP, BBC) provided contemporaneous market reporting around notable episodes; for example, reports in 2022–2024 documented oil-price moves and heterogeneous equity reactions around the Russia–Ukraine conflict and regional tensions.
Morningstar and other analyst commentary offered company- and sector-level perspectives on how integrated majors, E&P firms, and service companies reacted to price changes and supply-risk narratives.
Academic literature and reviews (ScienceDirect and peer-reviewed journals) examining the link between geopolitical events, oil-price shocks, and stock returns underpinned the empirical summary that predictability is event-concentrated.
Market commentary and analyst notes (selected brokerage and asset-manager commentaries cited in press reporting) explained moderating roles of OPEC+ actions and SPR releases.

All references above are summarized for context and were consulted for factual statements. This article does not provide investment advice or endorse any third-party firm. When seeking trading or custody services, Bitget is highlighted for its exchange and wallet offerings where appropriate.