Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesEarnSquareMore
daily_trading_volume_value
market_share58.93%
Current ETH GAS: 0.1-1 gwei
Hot BTC ETF: IBIT
Bitcoin Rainbow Chart : Accumulate
Bitcoin halving: 4th in 2024, 5th in 2028
BTC/USDT$ (0.00%)
banner.title:0(index.bitcoin)
coin_price.total_bitcoin_net_flow_value0
new_userclaim_now
download_appdownload_now
daily_trading_volume_value
market_share58.93%
Current ETH GAS: 0.1-1 gwei
Hot BTC ETF: IBIT
Bitcoin Rainbow Chart : Accumulate
Bitcoin halving: 4th in 2024, 5th in 2028
BTC/USDT$ (0.00%)
banner.title:0(index.bitcoin)
coin_price.total_bitcoin_net_flow_value0
new_userclaim_now
download_appdownload_now
daily_trading_volume_value
market_share58.93%
Current ETH GAS: 0.1-1 gwei
Hot BTC ETF: IBIT
Bitcoin Rainbow Chart : Accumulate
Bitcoin halving: 4th in 2024, 5th in 2028
BTC/USDT$ (0.00%)
banner.title:0(index.bitcoin)
coin_price.total_bitcoin_net_flow_value0
new_userclaim_now
download_appdownload_now
does howard lutnick own tesla stock? Explained

does howard lutnick own tesla stock? Explained

This article answers the query does howard lutnick own tesla stock by summarizing Cantor Fitzgerald’s reported TSLA holdings, Lutnick’s personal disclosures, public comments urging Tesla purchases,...
2026-01-22 09:37:00
share
Article rating
4.4
117 ratings

Howard Lutnick and Tesla stock ownership

This article addresses the question "does howard lutnick own tesla stock" by reviewing firm 13F filings, media reports, Lutnick’s ethics disclosures and public comments. Readers will learn what public records say about Cantor Fitzgerald’s TSLA exposure, what Lutnick personally disclosed, why the question became notable in 2024–2025, and which items remain unresolved as of the latest reporting.

Asking "does howard lutnick own tesla stock" seeks to establish whether Howard Lutnick himself — rather than Cantor Fitzgerald or related funds — holds direct long or derivative positions in Tesla, Inc. (TSLA), and whether his public comments about Tesla created ethics or conflict-of-interest concerns. In short: public 13F summaries and media reports attribute sizeable Tesla exposure to Cantor Fitzgerald’s funds in 2024, media and filings indicate both stock and options positions, and Lutnick’s personal disclosures and divestment commitments (filed ahead of his 2025 confirmation) raise questions that watchdogs and lawmakers have investigated. The record includes differing accounts as to personal versus firm holdings; this article flags those differences and cites primary reports.

Background

Howard Lutnick is the long-time chief executive of Cantor Fitzgerald, a large U.S. financial services firm. As of 2025 he was nominated and confirmed to serve as U.S. Commerce Secretary; that public role increased scrutiny of his financial holdings and the holdings of Cantor Fitzgerald.

  • As of Jan 24, 2025, Reuters reported on Lutnick’s asset disclosures ahead of his confirmation and described commitments he made to address potential conflicts (As of Jan 24, 2025, according to Reuters).
  • Lutnick’s public prominence as a CEO and then Cabinet official is why questions such as "does howard lutnick own tesla stock" received press and regulatory attention.

Sources: Howard Lutnick — biographical details from public reporting and corporate disclosures; Reuters (Jan 24, 2025).

Cantor Fitzgerald’s reported Tesla holdings

Multiple financial-media summaries of institutional filings (Form 13F and related disclosures) reported that Cantor Fitzgerald-affiliated funds held meaningful exposure to Tesla (TSLA) during 2022–2024 and re-entered or increased exposure in mid-to-late 2024.

As background, Form 13F filings are quarterly SEC reports that disclose many institutional long-equity positions; they do not always show all derivative details or intraday trading. Media summaries can add interpretation about option positions and economic exposure.

As of the dates cited in media coverage:

  • A November 2024 summary (reported by Benzinga and presented via TradingView summaries) indicated Cantor Fitzgerald’s funds held substantial exposure to Tesla, with reported values described in the hundreds of millions of dollars (e.g., reported exposure figures near $804 million) and holdings measured in the hundreds of thousands to over a million shares-equivalent via options and equity positions (As of Nov 2024, according to Benzinga/TradingView summaries).

  • Media reports summarized quarter-by-quarter movements: a small position in early 2022, a ramp-up through 2022–2023, a trimming or apparent exit in early 2024, and a reported re-entry in Q3 2024 with positions described in some summaries as roughly 1.17 million–1.2 million shares-equivalent before further trimming toward the end of 2024 (as reported in public 13F summaries cited by financial press).

These media accounts attribute most of the share-level numbers to institutional filing summaries and to options-equivalent calculations the press derived from publicly available filings.

Detailed filings and timeline

Reported quarter-level movements (media summaries of 13F and related filings):

  • Early 2022: Cantor Fitzgerald reportedly held a small TSLA stake in early 2022 filings.
  • Mid–late 2022: The firm increased exposure through 2022 as markets re-priced EV-related equities.
  • 2023: Additional changes in allocation occurred as the firm managed its portfolio exposure; media summaries indicate both equity and derivative adjustments.
  • Early 2024: Some filings showed the firm trimming or exiting parts of its TSLA exposure.
  • Q3 2024: Press summaries (Benzinga/TradingView) reported a re-entry and a sizeable position, translating to roughly 1.17M–1.2M shares-equivalent.
  • Late 2024: Subsequent summaries suggested trimming to about ~740k shares-equivalent by year-end as reported in press recaps.

All of the above quarter-level characterizations are based on media interpretations of Form 13F data and derivative disclosure summaries (As reported by Benzinga/TradingView in Nov 2024; see Reuters for later context). Where press accounts differ slightly, this article notes the difference rather than asserting one single read of the filings.

Options exposure and derivative positions

Media summaries noted that Cantor Fitzgerald’s TSLA economic exposure included options (reported puts and calls) in addition to direct stock positions. Options can change a manager’s effective exposure: long calls and short puts increase upside exposure, while long puts or covered calls can alter downside risk.

  • Benzinga/TradingView reporting in Nov 2024 described both equity and options exposure attributed to Cantor Fitzgerald, estimating stock-equivalent exposure to TSLA in the high hundreds of millions of dollars when option positions were converted to share-equivalent measures (As of Nov 2024, according to Benzinga/TradingView).

  • Because 13F filings primarily record long equity holdings and do not fully capture all derivative exposures, summaries that attempt to quantify options-related exposure rely on supplemental disclosures, public options-volume data, or the firm’s own reporting if available.

Readers seeking to verify quarter-level numbers should consult the SEC 13F database and the specific reporting period summaries cited by financial press; the media summaries mentioned above are the proximate public sources for the numbers reported.

Lutnick’s personal disclosures and divestment commitments

When Lutnick was nominated to a Cabinet role, he submitted required public financial disclosures and reportedly committed to divest or step back from certain business roles to comply with federal ethics rules.

  • As of Jan 24, 2025, Reuters reported that Lutnick filed asset disclosures ahead of confirmation and outlined planned steps to resolve conflicts, including resignations from certain positions and divestment of business interests over specified timelines (As of Jan 24, 2025, according to Reuters).

  • Media coverage emphasized the distinction between firm holdings (Cantor Fitzgerald funds) and Lutnick’s personal holdings. Some reporting and watchdog statements questioned whether Lutnick personally retained direct TSLA exposure in personal accounts, trusts, or deferred compensation vehicles.

  • Public summaries of Lutnick’s ethics commitments indicated he intended to place certain investments in a qualified blind trust or to divest interests within a defined period. Reporting described those commitments but also flagged areas where public filings or press reports left open whether specific positions (e.g., TSLA exposure) were held personally versus only at the firm level.

Because individual ethics submissions and subsequent compliance certifications are handled by the U.S. Office of Government Ethics (OGE) and relevant agency ethics officials, determinations about compliance often depend on OGE reviews and any follow-up divestment reports.

Public statements recommending Tesla stock

The question "does howard lutnick own tesla stock" gained added prominence after public remarks in March 2025 in which Lutnick, on a televised program, urged viewers to buy Tesla. Several outlets reported the remarks and quoted Lutnick directly.

  • Electrek reported on March 19, 2025 that Lutnick told viewers to “buy Tesla,” citing his on-air comments (As of Mar 19, 2025, according to Electrek).

  • Business Insider and other outlets (e.g., The Daily Beast) published similar accounts on March 20, 2025 and shortly thereafter, quoting the remarks and noting their timing relative to Lutnick’s pending confirmation and to Cantor Fitzgerald’s reported TSLA exposure (As of Mar 20, 2025, according to Business Insider; also reported by The Daily Beast).

The public recommendation prompted immediate public and political attention because a sitting or incoming senior Cabinet member recommending purchases in a large publicly traded company raises clear public-ethics questions—especially when the nominee’s former firm held exposure to that company.

Ethical, legal, and political reactions

Following Lutnick’s public remarks and the disclosure of Cantor Fitzgerald’s reported holdings, ethics groups, members of Congress, and watchdog groups called for inquiries and clarification.

  • On Mar 20, 2025, the Campaign Legal Center issued a public statement noting that the comments and the ownership questions could implicate federal ethics rules and urged review (As of Mar 20, 2025, according to Campaign Legal Center).

  • On Apr 4, 2025, Senator Jack Reed released a press note calling for an Inspector General review and citing media-reported specific share figures attributed to Cantor Fitzgerald or related entities; the Reed release asked federal watchdogs to investigate whether any ethics rules were violated (As of Apr 4, 2025, according to the Senator Reed press release).

  • News commentary and editorial pieces in outlets such as RealClearMarkets and The Daily Beast debated whether Lutnick’s on-air remarks constituted an inappropriate endorsement and whether divestment timelines and blind trusts were sufficient to mitigate conflicts.

Potential ethics rules at issue

Critics cited several potential rules and norms:

  • Federal conflict-of-interest rules that bar federal employees from participating in matters where they or their spouses have a financial interest, and rules limiting use of public office for private gain.
  • Guidance about public statements by nominees and officials that could be seen as endorsements of private companies when the official or their immediate family retains financial exposure.

Formal legal determinations about violations require review by ethics officials (e.g., OGE) or Inspector General offices; public commentary and press reports do not by themselves resolve legal or administrative findings.

Market impact and chronology

Press accounts tied the sequence of events to certain market developments:

  • Media noted that Cantor Fitzgerald’s reported re-entry into TSLA in Q3 2024 and subsequent trimming in late 2024 occurred amid volatile share-price action in the electric-vehicle sector (As reported by Benzinga/TradingView in Nov 2024).

  • After Lutnick’s on-air March 2025 endorsement, some outlets reported short-term upticks in Tesla’s share price; however, determining causality between a single comment and broader market moves requires detailed market analysis and is often uncertain.

  • A White House Tesla-related event (timing referenced in press coverage) and related public moments added to market interest, though attributing price moves to one speaker or event is speculative without formal market microstructure analysis.

Analysts caution that many factors influence daily share price moves: macro news, earnings, sector rotation, institutional trading, and options flows. Public endorsements can influence retail sentiment, but springboard causal claims should be made carefully and with appropriate market data.

Outstanding questions and uncertainties

As of the latest public reporting cited here, several items remained unresolved or publicly ambiguous:

  • Personal vs. firm holdings: media summaries show sizable Cantor Fitzgerald exposure to TSLA, but it is not always transparent from press reports whether Lutnick personally retained direct TSLA holdings in individual accounts, family trusts, or deferred compensation vehicles versus exposure solely at the firm or fund level. Different reports emphasize different distinctions; readers should consult Lutnick’s published ethics disclosures and the firm’s public filings for definitive documentation.

  • Options and off-13F exposure: 13F filings capture many long equity holdings but do not always reflect short positions, certain derivatives, or intraday trades. Media summaries that estimate options exposure are useful but may not capture the full legal or economic picture.

  • Status of divestment and certification: reporters noted Lutnick’s commitments to divest or place assets into blind trusts; whether those actions were completed and certified by ethics officials at the time of reporting depends on follow-up filings and agency confirmations.

  • Results of investigations: requests for Inspector General review or OGE scrutiny were publicized; any resulting formal findings, letters, or enforcement actions would be issued by the relevant oversight body and should be consulted directly for final determinations.

See also

  • Cantor Fitzgerald (institutional investor and financial services firm)
  • Tesla, Inc. (TSLA)
  • U.S. Office of Government Ethics (OGE)
  • Federal conflict-of-interest rules and divestment guidance
  • SEC Form 13F institutional filings

References (selected)

  • As of Jan 24, 2025, Reuters reported on Lutnick’s asset disclosures ahead of confirmation, detailing planned resignations and divestment commitments (Reuters, Jan 24, 2025).
  • As of Nov 2024, Benzinga and TradingView summarized Cantor Fitzgerald’s 13F filings and reported TSLA exposure estimates (Benzinga/TradingView, Nov 2024).
  • As of Mar 19–20, 2025, Electrek and Business Insider reported Lutnick’s televised remarks urging viewers to buy Tesla (Electrek, Mar 19, 2025; Business Insider, Mar 20, 2025).
  • As of Mar 20, 2025, the Campaign Legal Center published a statement urging review of potential ethics issues related to the comments (Campaign Legal Center, Mar 20, 2025).
  • As of Apr 4, 2025, Senator Jack Reed released a press statement requesting an Inspector General probe and citing media-reported share figures (Senator Jack Reed press release, Apr 4, 2025).
  • Additional coverage and commentary appeared in The Daily Beast and RealClearMarkets in March–April 2025.
  • Biographical and career background for Howard Lutnick is available in public profiles and reference summaries (see Lutnick biography entries and corporate materials).

Notes on sourcing and interpretation

  • Where press accounts differ on share counts, timing, or whether exposure was held by Lutnick personally versus Cantor Fitzgerald funds, this article marks those differences explicitly rather than asserting a single definitive narrative.

  • Form 13F filings and official ethics disclosures are primary public records for institutional holdings and nominee disclosures; press summaries cite those filings and provide interpretation. For verification, consult the original filings and Lutnick’s official ethics submission (agency/OGE records) when they are publicly available.

Practical next steps for readers seeking verification

  • If you want to confirm the institutional positions attributed to Cantor Fitzgerald, review the SEC EDGAR 13F filings for the quarters of interest and compare the holdings schedules.

  • To verify Lutnick’s personal disclosures and any divestment or blind trust arrangements, consult the Office of Government Ethics filings and any agency certifications made public during the confirmation process.

  • For contemporaneous market data (share price moves, volume), use a reputable market-data provider and reference the specific dates cited in media coverage (e.g., mid–late 2024 and March–April 2025) to isolate short-term price movements.

Further reading and related Bitget resources

  • Learn how institutional filings like 13F are reported and how derivative positions can affect economic exposure; Bitget’s education hub explains how public filings are used in market analysis.

  • If you are tracking equities and crypto-related company news, consider secure custody and portfolio-tracking tools; for crypto wallets, Bitget Wallet provides user-friendly custody and portfolio features for digital-asset users.

Final summary and action

For readers asking "does howard lutnick own tesla stock": public reporting shows Cantor Fitzgerald-affiliated funds had notable TSLA exposure through 2022–2024 (including equity and options exposure) and that Lutnick made public disclosures and divestment commitments during his 2025 confirmation process. Press accounts differ on whether Lutnick personally retained direct TSLA holdings versus exposure handled at the firm or through trusts; ethics groups and at least one Senator called for further review after Lutnick’s public remarks urging viewers to buy Tesla in March 2025 (As of Mar–Apr 2025, according to cited reporting). For definitive, up-to-date verification, consult the underlying Form 13F filings, Lutnick’s formal ethics disclosures, and any subsequent Inspector General or OGE findings.

Want to explore holdings data or track market reactions yourself? Check institutional filings, monitor official ethics publications, and for secure crypto custody and wallet needs, consider Bitget Wallet as a starting point to manage on-chain assets.

Explore more market-structure and filings explanations on Bitget Wiki and secure your digital-asset needs with Bitget Wallet.

The content above has been sourced from the internet and generated using AI. For high-quality content, please visit Bitget Academy.
Buy crypto for $10
Buy now!

Trending assets

Assets with the largest change in unique page views on the Bitget website over the past 24 hours.

Popular cryptocurrencies

A selection of the top 12 cryptocurrencies by market cap.
© 2025 Bitget