is there an etf for defense stocks

Yes — there are multiple ETFs that provide exposure to defense, aerospace, and defense-technology companies. This guide explains how these ETFs work, major U.S. and UCITS examples, index rules, ris...

2025-11-10 16:00:00

By Nexus Link

Article rating

4.6

103 ratings

Bitget offers a variety of ways to buy or sell popular cryptocurrencies. Buy now!

A welcome pack worth 6200 USDT for new users! Sign up now!

ETFs for Defense Stocks

As of 2026-01-15, this article surveys product types and considerations based on issuer product pages and industry ETF lists. Readers should verify live fund metrics on issuer pages before making decisions.

Brief answer and article roadmap

A common investor question is: is there an etf for defense stocks. The short answer is yes — there are multiple exchange-traded funds that provide direct and thematic exposure to companies involved in defense, aerospace, homeland security and defence-related technologies. This guide will explain what defense ETFs are, how they developed, the different fund types, notable U.S. and European/UCITS examples, index methodologies and holdings, historical performance characteristics, key risks, tax and trading notes, ESG considerations, and practical selection criteria for investors and traders (including those using Bitget).

Overview

A "defense ETF" is an exchange-traded fund that targets companies whose primary business involves defense manufacturing, aerospace systems, military electronics, homeland security services, or defence-related technologies such as cybersecurity, space systems, and drones. Defense ETFs can be broad sector indexes that track large aerospace & defence contractors, or narrower thematic funds focused on defence technology.

Investors use defense ETFs for several reasons:

Sector exposure: to gain targeted exposure to defence and aerospace industries without buying single stocks.
Diversification: to spread company-specific risk across a basket of contractors and suppliers.
Income: many large defence companies pay dividends, so some ETFs have attractive yields.
Thematic plays: to target trends such as space systems, defense technology, or cybersecurity applied to military use.

This guide addresses the question, is there an etf for defense stocks, by surveying types, major offerings, how indexes are built, and practical risks and selection criteria.

History and market development

Defense-sector ETFs emerged as part of the wider ETF industry growth in the 2000s and 2010s. Early product offerings tended to track broad aerospace & defense indices, providing a simple sector play. Over time, product variety expanded to include thematic ETFs oriented to defence tech, space, drones, and cybersecurity, as well as some actively managed funds that seek to pick winners within the sector.

Drivers of growth have included rising government budgets for national defence (budget trends can influence contractor revenue expectations), increased institutional interest in thematic exposures, and heightened demand from retail and adviser channels seeking tactical sector allocation tools. Geopolitical events and technological shifts (for example, the commercialization of space systems and rapid advances in defense-related AI, autonomy and cybersecurity) have prompted issuers to create targeted ETF wrappers.

As the category matured, listings appeared in different domiciles to serve local investors — U.S.-listed ETFs and UCITS-compliant funds for European investors — with accumulating and distributing share classes and different currency hedging options.

Types of defense ETFs

Broad aerospace & defense (sector) ETFs

Broad aerospace & defense ETFs are typically passive, index-tracking products that follow a market-cap-weighted or rules-based index of large and mid-cap aerospace, defence and homeland-security companies. These funds include major prime contractors (aircraft and weapons manufacturers), engine makers, and systems integrators, plus a selection of suppliers.

Key features:

Diversified across several large names but often top-heavy toward the largest primes.
Designed for investors seeking sector beta rather than active stock selection.
Often have regular dividend distributions reflective of constituent payouts.

These funds answer the basic investor question: is there an etf for defense stocks that gives broad exposure? Yes — these are the instruments most investors mean.

Defense-tech and thematic ETFs

Defense-tech or thematic defence ETFs focus on specific technologies that support modern defence capabilities: cybersecurity, space systems, missile and sensor technology, and autonomy. These ETFs tend to include a mix of traditional defense contractors and pure-play technology firms whose products have defence applications.

Differences from broad sector funds:

More concentrated around themes (e.g., space, cyber).
Holdings can include non-traditional defence companies (tech firms, satellite operators).
Higher thematic risk and potentially higher volatility; may trade at different valuation multiples.

These thematic funds appeal to investors who want exposure to technology-driven opportunities in defence rather than the classic supplier/prime-contractor mix.

Active defense ETFs

Active ETFs in the defence space use portfolio managers to select stocks and manage weightings rather than strictly tracking an index. Pros and cons include:

Pros: potential to outperform benchmark through security selection, risk control or tactical allocation between sub-themes (e.g., space vs. traditional primes).
Cons: higher fees, manager risk, and the possibility of underperforming a low-cost passive alternative.

Active funds may be useful for investors wanting a professional view on which defence subsectors will benefit from upcoming contracts or technology adoption, but active outcomes depend heavily on manager skill.

Regional and regulatory variants (U.S.-listed vs UCITS/European ETFs)

ETF issuers list products in different domiciles and under different regulatory regimes. Important distinctions:

U.S.-listed ETFs: domiciled in the U.S., often denominated in USD, widely accessible to U.S. taxable accounts.
UCITS / European ETFs: domiciled in European jurisdictions, comply with UCITS rules, and offer share classes that are accumulating or distributing and sometimes currency-hedged.

Differences matter for trading, tax, and investor eligibility. For example, European investors often prefer UCITS funds for local regulatory treatment and convenience. Investors should check domicile, share-class distribution policy, and currency exposure.

Major U.S.-listed defense ETFs (examples and comparison)

Below are representative U.S.-listed ETFs commonly used to get defence exposure. The listed funds are examples — fund metrics change over time, so verify expense ratios, AUM and holdings on issuer product pages.

iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA) — Issuer: iShares / BlackRock. Objective: track a U.S. aerospace and defence index. Typical profile: exposure to large U.S. primes and suppliers; commonly used as a broad sector vehicle. Expense ratio: check issuer page for current figure. Assets under management and top holdings change; verify latest data on the official product page.
Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) — Issuer: Invesco. Objective: track an index of aerospace and defense stocks. Typical profile: another broad sector option with overlapping large-cap holdings. Expense ratio and AUM should be confirmed on Invesco's product page.
Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) — Issuer: Global X. Objective: target defence-technology companies including cyber, space, and specialized systems. Typical profile: more thematic exposure with holdings that can include technology firms alongside contractors. Confirm expense ratio and holdings on the issuer's market summary.
iShares Defense Industrials Active ETF (ACTIVE) — Issuer: iShares / BlackRock. Objective: actively managed exposure across defense industrials. Typical profile: active management seeks to add value through security selection and active weightings. Active ETFs commonly have higher fees than passive peers; review prospectus for details.

When comparing these funds, investors typically evaluate: issuer and ticker, stated fund objective or index tracked, expense ratio, AUM (liquidity proxy), typical top holdings, and sector/industry weightings (for example, airframes vs. engines vs. electronics). As of 2026-01-15, readers should consult the respective issuer product pages for the most current metrics.

Major European / UCITS defense ETFs (examples)

European-domiciled and UCITS ETFs provide similar exposures but are structured to meet local regulatory and tax preferences. Issuers such as VanEck, HANetf, Global X (through UCITS), and iShares offer UCITS-compliant products that track defence indices or thematic defence-tech exposures.

Differences to note:

Currency and domicile: EUR/GBP listings and different base currencies.
Share classes: accumulating (reinvesting dividends) vs distributing (paying dividends) — choose based on tax preferences.
Regulatory treatment: UCITS constraints can affect holdings and concentration rules.

European investors seeking answers to is there an etf for defense stocks in a UCITS wrapper will typically find several options; check product documents for domicile, dividend policy and whether the fund uses replication or synthetic strategies.

Index methodologies and typical holdings

ETF providers design defense indices using clearly stated inclusion rules. Common methodology points:

Inclusion criteria: companies classified under aerospace & defence or related industries by standard industry classification systems, meeting minimum market-cap/liquidity thresholds.
Weighting: market-cap weighting is common, though some indices use modified caps, equal-weight, or factor adjustments.
Exclusions: some indices exclude companies based on ESG screens or revenue thresholds from controversial activities.

Typical holdings:

Large primes (airframes, defense platforms, major contractors).
Engine and propulsion manufacturers.
Electronic systems and sensor suppliers.
Specialized technology firms (space systems, satellite operators, cybersecurity firms with defence contracts).

Concentration: many defense ETFs are top-heavy with the largest primes making up a significant portion of assets. Thematic ETFs can be even more concentrated in smaller groups of companies.

Performance, income, and volatility

Historical return patterns for defense ETFs combine sector cyclicality with exposure to large-cap industrial and tech firms. Key characteristics:

Returns: often correlated with the industrials and aerospace sectors; defense ETFs can outperform during periods of increased defence spending expectations or underperform during broad market sell-offs.
Income: many constituents pay dividends; broad sector ETFs often deliver a yield in line with large-cap industrial indices. Thematic and active funds may have different yield profiles.
Volatility drivers: expectation changes about government defence budgets, contract awards, supply-chain disruptions, and shifts in technological adoption (e.g., autonomous systems) can move valuations.

Investors should treat defence ETFs as sector allocations that can behave differently from broader equity indices, especially during events that shift defence spending outlooks.

Risks and considerations

Investing in defense ETFs carries several specific risks:

Sector concentration risk: heavy exposure to a single industry increases sensitivity to industry-wide shocks.
Regulatory and political risk: changes in procurement rules, export controls, or national policy can affect revenues. Avoid discussing specific conflicts or politics — focus on the general nature of regulatory sensitivity.
Contract and capex cycles: defence prime revenues often depend on multi-year contracts and capital expenditure cycles; timing matters.
Ethical controversy: armaments and military-related business can raise ethical concerns for some investors and may impact flows or reputational issues.
Liquidity and tracking risk: smaller or thematic ETFs may have wider bid/ask spreads and tracking error versus a benchmark.

Investors should weigh these risks against their objectives and consider diversification and position sizing.

How to choose a defense ETF

When evaluating is there an etf for defense stocks that fits your portfolio, consider these selection criteria:

Index focus and holdings: broad sector vs thematic; check the top holdings and exposure to primes vs tech firms.
Expense ratio: lower fees usually help long-term net returns, though active strategies can justify higher fees if skillful.
AUM and liquidity: larger AUM and higher average daily volume generally reduce trading costs and the risk of closure.
Tracking error: review how closely passive funds track their benchmarks over time.
Domicile and tax treatment: U.S. vs UCITS implications for withholding and reporting.
Dividend policy: accumulating vs distributing share classes and yield expectations.
Active vs passive: active funds can add value but carry manager risk and higher costs.
ESG and ethical alignment: if defence exposure conflicts with personal or institutional ESG policies, check for screened products or narrower technology-only funds.

A disciplined checklist and reviewing the issuer prospectus and factsheet will help answer the practical question of which ETF best meets your allocation needs.

Trading, tax, and regulatory matters

Practical trading considerations:

Trading tickers: ETFs trade on exchanges by ticker; check the listing exchange and trading hours compatible with your account.
Bid/ask spreads: narrower spreads reduce cost; prefer funds with higher volume and AUM.
Use Bitget for trading: for users of Bitget, consider leveraging the platform’s ETF access and market tools. Bitget offers trading interfaces and wallet integration to manage holdings.

Tax and regulatory notes:

U.S. taxable accounts: U.S.-listed ETFs have tax rules based on U.S. regulations; investors should consult tax professionals.
Non-U.S. investors: UCITS ETFs often provide a tax-efficient wrapper for European investors; withholding rates on dividends and other cross-border tax treatments differ by domicile.
Withholding: foreign investors may face withholding on dividends; check domicile rules and tax treaties.

Always consult a tax advisor for personalized guidance.

Ethical, ESG and exclusion screens

Investing in defence-related companies raises ethical and ESG questions. Options for investors include:

Avoidance: exclude defence exposure entirely from portfolios.
Screened exposure: some funds offer screens to exclude certain sub-sectors or companies with controversial revenue sources.
Thematic tilt: choose defence-tech or space-focused ETFs that may emphasize dual-use technology companies with commercial revenue streams.

ESG ratings for defence-related funds often differ across providers because methodologies vary on how to weigh national security, revenue sources and corporate governance. If ESG alignment matters, review the fund’s ESG policy and third-party ratings.

Example use cases in a portfolio

Common allocation roles for defense ETFs include:

Core sector exposure: a diversified aerospace & defence ETF as part of an industrials or sector sleeve.
Tactical hedge: a shorter-term allocation to defence ETFs if an investor expects increased procurement or favorable policy moves.
Income allocation: some defense ETFs provide yield through dividend-paying constituents.
Thematic satellite holding: a smaller allocation to defense-tech or space-themed ETFs to capture technology-driven upside.

Position sizing and horizon should reflect the investor’s risk tolerance and time frame.

References (selected sources and further reading)

iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA) — issuer product page (BlackRock / iShares). Reported figures and holdings should be checked on the issuer's official product page.
Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) — issuer product page (Invesco). Verify expense ratio and holdings on Invesco's site.
Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) — market summaries and issuer materials provide thematic descriptions and holdings.
iShares Defense Industrials Active ETF (ACTIVE) — issuer product page (BlackRock / iShares). Consult active fund documents for management approach.
ETF industry lists and comparisons — ETF Database and aggregator resources (industry lists for aerospace & defense ETFs).
Fund research summaries (example: Fidelity mutual fund overview for defense and aerospace mutual funds gives additional context on sector funds).
Media and industry articles that rank and compare defense ETFs — sources such as financial news and investment guide pieces. As of 2026-01-15, product pages and ETF lists remain the primary source for fund metrics; always confirm current figures on issuer disclosures.

As of 2026-01-15, the above references were used to structure this guide. For up-to-date expense ratios, AUM, and holdings please consult the official product pages or prospectuses of each ETF issuer.

Final notes and next steps

If you asked, is there an etf for defense stocks, the practical answer is yes — and you can choose between broad sector ETFs, thematic defence-tech funds, or active strategies depending on your objectives. When comparing options, focus on index methodology, fees, liquidity, domicile and whether the fund’s holdings match your intended exposure.

If you trade or hold ETFs, consider using Bitget for trading and wallet services and review the fund prospectus and issuer factsheet before executing trades. For tax-sensitive decisions, consult a qualified tax adviser.

Want to explore similar thematic exposures or find ETF tickers available to trade on Bitget? Begin by reviewing issuer fact sheets, then evaluate liquidity and costs on the Bitget trading platform to determine which ETF fits your portfolio plan.

Note: This article is informational only and not investment advice. Always verify current fund data on issuer pages and consult a professional for personalized advice.

The content above has been sourced from the internet and generated using AI. For high-quality content, please visit Bitget Academy.