Will Nikola Stock Recover?

Will Nikola Stock Recover? This article examines Nikola Corporation’s history, Chapter 11 filing (Feb 19, 2025), asset sales, delisting and likely outcomes for common equity. It explains bankruptcy...

2025-10-18 16:00:00

By CryptoVoyager Nexus

Article rating

4.4

117 ratings

Bitget offers a variety of ways to buy or sell popular cryptocurrencies. Buy now!

A welcome pack worth 6200 USDT for new users! Sign up now!

Will Nikola Stock Recover?

Will Nikola stock recover is the question many retail investors asked after Nikola Corporation’s multi‑year decline ended in a Chapter 11 filing. This article examines that question directly. You will get a compact history, a timeline of critical events, a plain‑language review of the Chapter 11 process and asset disposition, scenarios that could allow equity to receive value, and the practical steps shareholders should follow to monitor recovery chances.

Background and company profile

Nikola Corporation was founded in 2014 and rose to prominence as an electric and hydrogen heavy‑truck developer. It went public via a SPAC in 2020 and at its 2020 peak carried a headline valuation in the tens of billions. The company marketed battery‑electric trucks, hydrogen fuel‑cell trucks, and associated hydrogen refueling infrastructure (often referred to as HYLA or hydrogen logistics offerings).

Early investor enthusiasm came from ambitious product roadmaps and the promise of zero‑emission heavy trucks, plus partnerships announced in 2020 that helped drive a speculative valuation. However, execution challenges, regulatory and legal events, and repeated production setbacks undermined that early optimism.

Key events timeline

Below is a concise chronological outline of major events that shaped recovery prospects for shareholders.

2020 — SPAC debut and hype: Nikola completed a SPAC merger and briefly became a high‑profile EV name with a multi‑billion dollar market cap.
2020‑2021 — Allegations and management change: Short‑seller reports alleging misleading statements by the founder created reputational damage. Founder exits followed and scrutiny intensified.
2022‑2024 — Production and safety setbacks: The company experienced production delays, recall actions and incidents including reported truck fires that reduced confidence in delivery capability.
2023‑2024 — Financing and dilution: Repeated capital raises, reverse stock splits and large equity issuances to stay funded further diluted existing holders.
Feb 19, 2025 — Chapter 11 filing: The company filed for Chapter 11 in U.S. Bankruptcy Court, aiming to restructure or monetize assets. As of Feb 19, 2025, the filing initiated a formal process that materially changed shareholder prospects.
Late Feb 2025 — Nasdaq suspension and delisting: Trading was suspended and the company was delisted from Nasdaq. Following delisting, shares moved to OTC trading under the ticker NKLAQ.
2025 — Asset sales and liquidation plan developments: Throughout 2025, the company sold facilities and assets and courts considered liquidation plans. Press coverage reported asset dispositions that shifted value to creditors and buyers rather than to common shareholders.

Financial condition at filing and immediate market reaction

As of Feb 19, 2025, Nikola’s Chapter 11 petition and related court filings provided the clearest public snapshot of the company’s balance sheet and liquidity. The filing indicated constrained cash resources and material secured and unsecured claims against the company. That filing triggered immediate market action: the public equity price collapsed, trading was suspended by Nasdaq and the company’s public market profile moved to OTC trading.

Market capitalization had fallen far from SPAC‑era peaks. While SPAC‑era valuations reached the tens of billions in 2020, trading and market value had contracted dramatically by 2024–2025 as the company burned cash, diluted equity and missed milestones. The Chapter 11 filing formalized the end of the previous corporate path and materially downgraded recovery prospects for common shareholders.

Causes of the collapse

The collapse of Nikola’s equity value was not the result of a single event. Rather, it reflected multiple interacting causes:

SPAC‑era valuation mismatch: A high speculative valuation based on future promises created an unsustainable starting point once execution proved difficult.
Product and execution failures: Missed production targets, vehicle fires and repeated recalls eroded customer and investor confidence and delayed revenue recognition.
High cash burn and dilution: Manufacturing and development of heavy vehicles are capital intensive; ongoing cash consumption required frequent capital raises that diluted early holders.
Management and governance issues: Allegations about earlier public statements and subsequent legal actions involving the founder were damaging to credibility and investor trust.
Competitive and market pressures: The EV and hydrogen truck markets saw increased competition and more cautious capital markets, limiting ability to raise non‑dilutive capital.
Macro financing environment: Higher interest rates and tighter venture/credit markets restricted access to favorable financing terms.

Bankruptcy, restructuring, and asset disposition

Chapter 11 process and objectives

Chapter 11 is a U.S. federal bankruptcy process designed to provide debtors with an opportunity to reorganize or to sell assets in an orderly way while maximizing recoveries for creditors. For a capital‑intensive manufacturer like Nikola, common Chapter 11 objectives include preserving operational value during sale processes, arranging debtor‑in‑possession financing, conducting auction processes for assets, and developing a plan that prioritizes creditor claims.

Common outcomes for distressed manufacturing startups include: a) an organized sale of assets to third parties that continue useful business lines, b) a restructuring that impairs or cancels equity, or c) liquidation where creditors recover in order of priority and equity receives little or nothing.

Known asset sales and transactions

Throughout 2025, court filings and press reports documented reported sales of facilities, equipment, intellectual property and vehicle inventories. As of mid‑2025, several facility and IP transactions were reported in bankruptcy pleadings and press coverage.

These asset sales commonly move value from the bankrupt company's balance sheet to buyers and to secured creditors if liens attach to sold assets. Reported buyers included industrial firms and asset buyers seeking to acquire serviceable manufacturing assets, intellectual property, and vehicle fleets.

Plan of liquidation and implications for shareholders

Bankruptcy law ranks claims: secured creditors and administrative claims are first, followed by unsecured creditors and bondholders; common shareholders are last. A court‑approved liquidation plan that contemplates cancellation of common stock or issuance of new securities to creditors generally results in existing common equity being cancelled or rendered worthless.

As of the reported 2025 liquidation plan developments, press reporting and court filings indicated scenarios where common stock could be cancelled with little or no residual for retail shareholders. That means the most likely outcome under those plans was no meaningful recovery for holders of pre‑bankruptcy common shares.

Trading status and investor practicalities

After Nasdaq suspended trading and delisted the company, Nikola’s shares moved to the OTC market under the ticker NKLAQ. OTC trading is typically thinner and more volatile, with limited liquidity and less stringent reporting requirements.

Investors should know that prices on OTC or “gray” markets during insolvency proceedings often do not reflect real recoverable value. Those prices can be driven by speculation, low‑volume trades and liquidity mechanics rather than by the expected distribution under a confirmed bankruptcy plan.

Recovery scenarios and valuation outlook

Bull case (what would enable equity recovery)

For common equity holders to recover value, several low‑probability conditions would typically have to occur:

There is a successful reorganization that preserves an ongoing equity interest for pre‑petition shareholders — rare when secured creditors have substantial claims.
Assets are sold for significantly more than the sum of secured claims, administrative costs and unsecured claims, leaving a residual distribution to equity.
An acquirer purchases the business and explicitly preserves or converts some portion of pre‑existing common equity into new public securities for shareholders.
Material and unexpected improvements in the end markets (for example, fast‑adoption breakthroughs for hydrogen trucks) lead to competitive bidders paying premiums for the company’s IP or contracts.

Each of these outcomes is possible in theory but uncommon in practice when a company enters Chapter 11 with significant secured debt and when assets are specialized.

Bear case (most likely under current signals)

Given reported liquidation plan developments and the priority of creditors, the far more likely scenario is that common equity is cancelled or becomes functionally worthless. Asset sales are likely to satisfy secured creditors first, with unsecured creditors receiving any residual. Common shareholders have low historical recovery rates in liquidation outcomes for capital‑intensive manufacturers.

Under this scenario, retail investors should expect negligible recoveries unless the bankruptcy process generates an unexpectedly large surplus after satisfying all senior claims.

Key drivers to watch

The following concrete events and documents will materially affect any recovery odds:

Final terms of the confirmed bankruptcy plan — whether it contemplates liquidation, a credit bid by secured creditors, or a reorganization.
Estimated recovery amounts presented in the debtor’s disclosure statement and schedules.
Auction results for major assets and bids filed by potential purchasers.
Any stalking‑horse agreements or credit bids by secured lenders or third‑party strategic investors.
Court rulings on lien priorities, administrative claim allowances and indemnity or litigation trust recoveries.

Legal, regulatory and reputational factors

Legal and regulatory history continues to affect recovery prospects. Earlier allegations about founder misconduct and subsequent legal proceedings damaged investor confidence and may have reduced the pool of strategic buyers willing to assume liabilities or reputational risk.

As of Feb 19, 2025, according to the company’s Chapter 11 filing, ongoing litigation and potential regulatory inquiries were listed among the liabilities and contingent claims. Those legal risks increase administrative and contingent claim costs, further reducing potential distributions to unsecured creditors and equity.

Analyst coverage, forecasts and market commentary

After a Chapter 11 filing and delisting, traditional analyst coverage frequently withdraws or shifts focus to asset valuations rather than issuer price targets. Pre‑bankruptcy price targets and growth forecasts become effectively irrelevant once a company is in formal insolvency, because market prices no longer represent a going‑concern equity valuation.

Post‑filing media coverage in 2025 focused on auction results, creditor recoveries and asset sale prices. Those analyses typically compare estimated proceeds from sales to the creditor waterfall to estimate likely outcomes for each claim class.

Lessons from comparable cases

Comparable SPAC‑era and clean‑tech bankruptcies show recurring patterns: an initial speculative valuation, execution and manufacturing challenges, repeated capital raises that dilute public equity, and eventual insolvency where secured creditors and acquirers capture most remaining value.

Examples from related industries highlight that shareholders of heavily indebted, asset‑intensive public startups frequently receive little or nothing in liquidation when claims and administrative costs exhaust available proceeds.

How investors should evaluate claims of “recovery”

Claims that “Nikola will recover” should be evaluated against concrete documents and timelines. Here is a practical checklist investors can use:

Read the Chapter 11 petition, schedules and the disclosure statement filed with the bankruptcy court.
Monitor court dockets for sale notices, bid deadlines, stalking‑horse motions and auction results.
Review creditor claims registers and any creditor committee statements about estimated recoveries.
Track the debtor’s cash‑in‑hand and projected cash needs listed in DIP financing motions.
Watch for court orders confirming the plan — the pivotal event that defines whether equity survives.
Recognize that OTC quote levels and low‑volume trades during insolvency do not equate to legally realizable value.

All of the above are public records. For authoritative information, prioritize the company’s SEC filings (if still available), bankruptcy court filings and official press releases.

Summary and likely outcome

While parts of Nikola’s business — facilities, intellectual property, fuel‑cell know‑how and vehicle inventories — could be purchased and continue under new owners, reported Chapter 11 and liquidation developments indicate that a full recovery of pre‑collapse equity value is unlikely. The bankruptcy priority rules and reported asset sale plans suggest a high probability that common equity will be cancelled or have no meaningful recovery.

Retail shareholders should therefore assume a high risk of loss unless the bankruptcy process yields unusually large residual proceeds after senior claims are satisfied. Watch the bankruptcy disclosure statement, auction results and confirmed plan language for the definitive answer.

Trading, custody and practical next steps for affected shareholders

If you hold pre‑bankruptcy Nikola shares, consider these practical steps (this is neutral information, not advice):

Confirm your share custody: verify whether your shares are held in a brokerage account or as physical stock certificates.
Monitor official notices from the transfer agent and the bankruptcy court for claim deadlines and ballot instructions.
Do not rely on OTC quotes as an indicator of recoverable value — they may reflect illiquid trades.
If you participate in forums or social media discussing recovery scenarios, prioritize court filings and official disclosures over rumor.
For trading or custody services after a delisting, consider reputable platforms; if you custody tokens or other digital assets elsewhere, Bitget Wallet is a recommended self‑custody option from Bitget for managing crypto and Web3 assets. For fiat and secondary trading in other assets, Bitget exchange offers trading services and educational resources.

References and further reading

To verify facts and follow developments, consult primary sources. As of Feb 19, 2025, according to Nikola’s Chapter 11 petition filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, the company disclosed its restructuring intent and listed assets and liabilities. As of late Feb 2025, according to Nasdaq notices and corporate filings, trading suspension and delisting actions were public. For ongoing, authoritative updates, consult the bankruptcy court docket, the debtor’s official filings and major press coverage from widely read financial news outlets and legal reporting.

Key documents to watch (publicly filed): the Chapter 11 petition, the schedules of assets and liabilities, the disclosure statement, motions to approve sales, and the proposed plan of liquidation or reorganization. These documents contain the quantifiable estimates that determine recovery outcomes.