David Schwartz, Ripple’s former CTO, made it clear that once a transaction is valid on the XRP Ledger, neither Ripple nor anyone else can block it, thus addressing lingering worries about control and centralization on the network.
Schwartz spoke up after fresh chatter on social media raised questions about whether XRP payments could be censored or frozen.
Ripple CTO emeritus explained that the XRP Ledger runs on consensus rules so tight that even Ripple itself can’t stop a valid transaction from going through. He said the only time a transaction won’t go through is if it breaks the network’s validity conditions or if users intentionally tweak those rules themselves, which just makes the transaction invalid.
Schwartz also broke down how XRP escrow works, stressing that funds in escrow are controlled entirely by the protocol logic and not by any central approval process. Users can lock XRP in escrow with set rules, and once those rules are met, the funds unlock automatically. No one, not even Ripple, can step in to block or speed up the release.
The comments come as debate continues over how decentralized XRPL really is, especially around the Unique Node List (UNL) that decides which validators get to help run consensus. Critics have suggested that control over validators could, in theory, open the door to censorship or network manipulation.
However, Schwartz pushed back on those concerns, saying validators can’t make honest nodes accept bad transactions, create XRP out of thin air, or mess with account balances.
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});Even if a group of validators tried to disrupt things, they couldn’t seize funds or censor transactions under normal conditions. They could maybe slow things down, but not steal or block.
As for XRP’s ecosystem, the Devnet is set to reboot in early March as developers prepare for protocol upgrades, a signal that the network keeps evolving.
XRP has historically attracted greater scrutiny than networks such as Bitcoin and Ethereum, owing to Ripple’s longstanding involvement in its development and ecosystem maintenance. Clarifications from people like Schwartz help reinforce that the network actually runs on decentralized rules, not central control.
Related: XRP Debate Intensifies as Justin Bons and David Schwartz Clash Over XRPL Centralization
